Everyone experiences grief differently.
The way we react to difficult situations is deeply personal and often difficult to explain. There can be preconceptions about what is the 'right' way to show, or in some cases contain, emotions. The truth is, there is no right or wrong way.
I've been to a number of funerals over the last few years for a variety of people. Many were extended family members I'd had little to no relationship with. Attending these sorts of funerals is always an exercise in expectations - your own as well as those of others.
When everyone around me is clearly experiencing heightened emotions I tend to feel that I'll seem callous if I don't follow suit. This can be incredibly difficult when I don't have the same relationship with the person being remembered as those around me do.
I'm a cryer. I cry when I'm sad, I cry when I'm angry. I cry when a movie has any sort of negative emotion. I watched a film recently where I couldn't have cared less about the characters and in fact just wanted the story to end. Still, I cried along with them.
So I don't tend to have any trouble crying at funerals, whether I knew the deceased well or not. At one recent funeral I didn't know the man being farewelled and had never met his wife or children. But that didn't matter. Hearing the eulogies, watching the family - you can't help but feel some fraction of the grief these people are feeling. Funerals are about the living. They're about honouring the dead in a way that helps the living move on with their lives. And they are often deeply moving.
Funerals aren't the difficult part of grief for me as they're generally a celebration of life. At one recent funeral many of us were smiling as silent tears rolled down as faces as we listened to beautiful, heartwarming stories that we all had our own versions of. You know what emotions you're supposed to feel and display and if you're anything like me, they don't have to be forced.
It's before the funeral that is most difficult for me.
I'm never sure how to approach loss. Even before someone has died, when they become ill and true worry sets in, I often find it difficult to know how to feel. Or more accurately, I find it difficult to do the feeling.
I know that I'm supposed to be sad and I know that I am sad. I'm afraid for the person's safety and I'm deeply worried for their loved ones. I just don't know how to express these feelings.
Any other time, emotions are my thing. I am great at feeling and conveying emotions. In fact, I often get so emotional that I lose all control and the emotions just do their own thing. Let's just say that a poker face is not my forte.
But when a relative was admitted to hospital recently with a potentially life-threatening condition, I found it difficult to express the emotions I knew I should be feeling. I knew I was sad. I knew I was scared. I could see the faces of close family members in my head and I knew how terrified they must be. It hurt to know that they were suffering. But when confronted with these sort of situations it seems that a sort of automatic self-preservation tactic kicks in. I know I'm experiencing these emotions but it's as if I'm observing them from a distance. My emotional centre outsources and my brain attempts to focus on other far less important things.
Useless things. Things I can control.
When somebody dies and a funeral is announced, I focus on what I'm going to wear, whether it will interfere with work, whether people I haven't seen recently will be there. When someone falls ill I think about mundane activities coming up in my life. I become quiet and calm. I speak to people in a quietly cheery way. I observe proceedings as if from a completely disinterested standpoint. I separate.
This scares the hell out of me.
How can I be thinking about clothes at a time like this? How dare I think about dinner with friends when there's a family out there who will never have dinner all together again? What's wrong with me? Do I have no compassion? Will other people realise how heartless I am?
In my lucid moments I know that I am none of these things. I am compassionate. I am thoughtful and kind and selfless when need be. I just have a very specific coping mechanism.
By keeping my strongest feelings behind a veil I can stop myself from descending into the sort of hysteria which is always lurking at the back of my psyche. The only explanation I can come up with is that I focus on what I can control, no matter how unimportant it may be, to cope with the total breakdown I have the potential to experience. Because isn't death and grief the ultimate loss of control? We can prolong lives in the right situations but we haven't yet found a way to keep grief and loss at bay. Eventually, all are lost.
And I just don't know how to deal with that.
I like what I like, but I don't love everything. This little blog is full of my thoughts, dreams and feelings, as well as some film and music reviews to give me journalism practice. Masses, enjoy...
Sunday, July 15, 2018
Sunday, May 27, 2018
Problematic On-Screen Romances: Who Cares About Autonomy?
If you know me at all (or if you’ve read this blog) then you'll know
I love a good romantic comedy. And I enjoy a mediocre romantic comedy. Let's
face it, if it's a largely inoffensive, not entirely moronic film about two
people having ridiculous meet cutes and eventually walking off into the sunset,
I'm in. They're like comfort food and pyjamas (and incidentally pair perfectly
with both): they wrap you up all warm and fuzzy and ask nothing of you.
So it isn't really surprising that I've watched two romantic
comedies in the last week. One was an older film I hadn't seen in years (Chasing
Liberty) and the other was a new Netflix film recommended by a friend (The
Kissing Booth). While I did find moments to enjoy in both films, I found
myself distracted from the by-the-numbers cute moments by some much more
sinister moments which were dressed up as romance.
Full disclosure: many, many
spoilers ahead.
Chasing Liberty is a sweet enough film that is often overlooked by its twin, First
Daughter. Both films centre on a college-aged American girl who just
happens to be the daughter of the current President of the USA (or 'first
daughter'). Both feature a meet cute with a dashing love interest who turns out
to be an undercover secret service agent. Both films also came out in 2004,
just to add insult to injury. Like minds?
When you've got two roughly identical films coming out in the same
year, one is bound to eclipse the other and for some reason First
Daughter emerged victorious, at least amongst my friends. It has an
arguably better script and I don't think I'm the only person who quite likes
the idea of Michael Keaton as President. I'm a little more partial to Chasing
Liberty, but that could largely be due to the presence of Matthew Goode,
who is perfectly named and makes everything he appears in better (see: Downton Abbey and Leap
Year).
You might think that I'm here today to talk about the relationship
between the leads in Chasing Liberty and I can understand why
you would. The deception narrative is one that is a stalwart of
romantic comedies as it provides ample drama while still allowing us to warm to
generally charming characters. It also proves problematic, as one or more
characters are generally in the dark about the others' intentions, which can
lead to some questionable issues of consent.
This is certainly the case with Chasing Liberty -
the look on Mandy Moore's face when she discovers the truth is heartbreaking
and you can't help but feel for her. She's just found out that the man she's
been falling in love with, has in fact lost her virginity to, has been lying to
her. It's a betrayal that is hard to overlook but genuine chemistry between the
leads distracts you from the underlying themes, as is of course the intention.
Strangely, that's not the relationship that inspired this blog
post, perhaps because it's so well documented. The 'romance' that stood out for
me in my recent rewatch was that of a pair of secret service agents assigned to
protect the heroine, played by Jeremy Piven and Annabella Sciorra. Playing
Weiss and Morales, respectively, these two side characters are supposed to
represent the 'will they/won't they' side of romantic comedies. They flirt,
they bicker, they have a fight and finally realise they are meant to be
together. I don't really remember them from previous watches (probably
distracted by Matthew Goode) but I couldn't take my eyes away from them this
time around. What had previously seemed like playful banter and hurt feelings
was revealed to be something far more sinister.
The basic story for these two is that Weiss fancies Morales,
Morales wants to focus on her job and thinks Weiss is a bit of a player, she
rejects him, he gets offended, they eventually apologise to each other and walk
off into the sunset together. So far, so fine. Having characters who are
attracted to each other, make those feelings known to the other and have a
peaceful relationship is apparently very very boring because we seem to see
them on screen so rarely. Gomez and Morticia Addams are a rare example of a screen
couple who never suspect the other of cheating or do anything to hurt the
other. They just enjoy their life together and are happily in love. Well, they
are kooky.
Weiss and Morales are not the Addams. Weiss is a whining 'not all
men' type who spends the first 30 minutes of screentime making inappropriate
comments about Morales' appearance while working. He says her blouse looks good
on her and tells her to wear it more often. She tells him it's a sweater so he
orders her to take the compliment. Later, he asks if she gets jet lag. When
Morales tells him she takes 'herbs' to reset her clock, he tells her "I'd
like to reset your clock. Just saying."
These exchanges are clearly meant to come across as flirty banter between two people who know each other well, which might be explainable
if it didn't come across as so incredibly creepy. Morales makes it clear that
she doesn't appreciate these comments and asks Weiss to stop making them and
focus on work. Weiss slimily acts as if she is being unfriendly. Any girl who
has ever been wolf whistled or told to 'take a compliment!' by a stranger on
the street who just told her to smile will understand how unsettling these
sorts of acts can be, whether you know the other person well or not.
Clearly not content with just making her uncomfortable, Weiss
decides to step it up and moves into sexual harassment territory with this
sweet little exchange.
Weiss: This is a Mickey Mouse assignment. I resent it. Do you?
Morales: No.
Weiss: I do.
Morales: I just do what I'm told.
Weiss: Oh yeah? Strip naked.
There isn't a single thing about this conversation that doesn't
scream 'inappropriate'. Up until this point, Morales has given no indication
that she finds Weiss remotely charming or sexually appealing. He, on the other
hand, has made it abundantly clear that he not only desires her but also simply
expects that to be enough reason for Morales to fall into his arms. When she
calls him on his conduct following this exchange, demanding to know if these
sort of tactics ever actually get him anywhere with women, Weiss tries to
elicit sympathy by telling her that he hasn't had any success with women since
his hairline began receding.
The worst part of this is that it works. He successfully guilt
trips Morales into telling him that he is good-looking and doesn't need to
worry about his hair, as some women consider baldness sexy.
This is a perfect example of emotional blackmail. Weiss makes
Morales, his co-worker and object of his affections, feel like the bad guy
because she hurt his delicate feelings. Never mind that he made her
uncomfortable and took her mind off her job. The truth is that he truly does
seem to want her to be an object - a programmable entity that responds to
stimuli in a chosen way. He doesn't want a living, breathing human woman who
will call him out on his behaviour or, god forbid, not want to sleep with a man
who harasses her. What a dreamboat.
By the end of the film the two characters have had a few more
interactions very similar to the one above and have inexplicably fallen in
love. Weiss tells Morales to kiss him and she does. Her autonomy is seemingly
gone but then again, it had always seemed irrelevant. Had they been the
principle characters in this film they might have received their fare share of
flack from audiences. As side characters, they go largely unnoticed.
Morales & Weiss. I hate you both and everything you
stand for.
More's the pity, then, that Weiss and Morales were not the most
unsettling quasi-romantic pairing I encountered recently.
The Kissing Booth is a recent addition to the swathe of original content popping up
on Netflix. It's a teen romantic comedy-drama that utilises many of the usual
tropes and isn't constrained by the sorts of restrictions this film might have
encountered on American TV. The characters drink, swear, get drunk and have
sex, and even the characters we are supposed to mock have perfect skin and
teeth. (Though there's actually an unnamed peripheral character sporting some old
fashioned, wrap-around-the-head orthodontia but rather than being played for
laughs she is frequently shown to be included in all school activities and
parties.)
The film stars Joey King as Elle, whose main storyline concerns
her struggle to have it all: namely, she wants to stay close to her BFF Lee
(Joel Courtney) while conducting a secret relationship with his older brother
Noah (Jacob Elordi). Lee and Elle have promised to never date each other's
relatives, so therein lies the conflict. So far, so standard teen drama.
Lee and Elle are established as besties, Elle and Noah flirt, they
start a secret relationship, Lee finds out and drops Elle as a friend, Elle
dumps Noah as a result, Noah leaves but not really and Elle apologises to Lee
just in time for Noah to make a final surprise appearance so they can declare
their love for one another.
Cute, right?
Wrong. Oh so, so wrong.
On the first day back at school after holidays, Elle experiences
some classic movie pratfalls that lead to her having to wear an old and
therefore far too small skirt to school. She immediately attracts attention,
particularly from fellow student Tuppen, who wastes no time in groping her.
Elle is visibly upset, which leads to Noah attacking Tuppen and almost beating
him to a bloody pulp.
This is not first sign we've seen of Noah's quick anger and
violent tendencies. The opening montage, intended to be humorous, chronicles
the first 16 years of Elle and Lee's lives and features frequent incidences
where Noah floors his peers with a punch or six. Again, this is played for
laughs.
Tuppen is made to apologise to Elle by the principal, who also
reprimands her for her choice of uniform. Following his apology, Tuppen passes
Elle a note asking what he needs to do to get her number. While some people
(me) would see this as beyond creepy and would tell him where to stick it,
Elle, like so many screen girls before her, is flattered and rewards him with
her phone number. Lee thinks she's crazy, which is refreshing, but Elle still
gets all gussied up and heads out for her date with Tuppen.
He doesn't show, so she goes to meet Lee and he tells her that she
is better than the sort of guy who clearly doesn't appreciate her. Thanks,
Supportive Best Friend Lee! Shame we won't be seeing you again.
Tuppen eventually makes an appearance and apologises for standing
her up. He tells Elle that Noah told him not to go out with her and has in fact
been intimidating other students to stop them following suit. Elle is
understandably furious and calls Noah to tell him off. He finds the situation
amusing and tells her that he's just trying to protect her because she's
"like his little sister". Another classic teen drama trope. The older
guy makes the younger girl feel like she has to prove herself to get out of the
'sister-zone', so she starts dressing more provocatively and acting more
mature. It's a power play.
I happened to be live-texting this film with my friend, who had
already watched it and recommended it to me. When I expressed my opinion that
Noah seemed controlling, she countered that he was only controlling because he
was jealous. We joked that it seemed very 'Edward Cullen' of him. (Yes, I know
my age is showing. I was the Twilight generation, so sue me.)
Maybe, MAYBE, I could have let this one slide. Ok sure, you want
to date someone, you don't want other people sniffing around them. I get that.
Happens to all of us. Intimidating other people so they don't go after a girl
who you aren't dating and are in fact actively rejecting? NOT OK.
It's made pretty clear that Elle has been useless at hiding her
feelings for Noah from the age of 14. Lee knows it and mocks her for it, their
respective parents know it and think it's cute and everyone else at school
knows it but since they all apparently think Noah is some sort of god among
men, she doesn't exactly stand out.
But Elle respects her friendship with Lee too much to pursue a
relationship, plus there's the aforementioned 'sister-zoning'. So she happily
plods along planning a Kissing Booth with Lee for the school's carnival. (Don't
even get me STARTED on how inappropriate I think it is for a high school to
authorise such a concept, and for a school event no less! Just ick.)
The booth is a hit, Lee is initially considered underwhelming by
the school's female population as a kissing candidate but manages to get a kiss
and a girlfriend out of it to boot. Elle is sticking firm to her plan to stay
firmly away from the main action and just handle admin until the obligatory
mean girls convince her that she has to work the other side of the booth. Still
ick.
Of course, Noah rocks up and plants her first kiss on her. The
camera spins, twinkly lights appear and it's all pretty cute. Young love!
Star-crossed romance! It's meant to be!
Don't get comfortable.
Elle spends a few seconds as the heart eye emoji before
remembering her bestie Lee (who I'd actually already begun to despise due to an
incident at a party earlier in the film where Elle gets spectacularly drunk and
embarrasses herself while Lee just stands nearby looking uncomfortable. If your
friend is clearly out of it and starts to remove their clothes in a public
space while others cheer her on, you SHUT THAT SHIT DOWN. Poor form, Lee.)
Noah walks off to charm some other girl out of her knickers and
Elle interrupts Lee's impromptu date to tell him about the kiss. He's caught
off guard, she reassures him it was a stunt for charity money and he decides
that it's all fine as long as she doesn't break their rule about dating
relatives.
As could only be expected, Lee heads off with his new girl and
Elle is left to find her own way home. Wow, thanks Lee. It starts to rain, Noah
turns up on his motorcycle in a rough approximation of the knight in shining
armour and offers her a lift until the rain gets too heavy and they have to run
for cover.
There just *happens* to be a Sound Of Music-esque
gazebo in easy reach, so they flee to it and promptly commence snogging. It's
vaguely cute, though the huge height difference did put me off a little (she
looks like a child next to him, which at her age, I guess she is). Then they're
surprised by a groundskeeper (are they on private property?) who drops some
helpful exposition about all the other girls he's caught Noah making out with
there.
Elle is humiliated, she yells at Noah for treating her like any other
cheap floozy and demands he take her home, which he does. She clearly doesn't
stay mad for long though because she is soon making a pro-con list about dating
Noah.
No really. It’s colour-coded.
Until this point, even with the fighting scenes, the inevitable
relationship between Elle and Noah comes across as pretty standard teen cute.
They've both clearly had feelings for the other for some time but haven't felt able
to act on them. Don't worry, you won't be a fan for long.
With their relationship still unresolved, Elle attends a party
with other students and, of course, Noah. Another guy propositions Elle, she
makes it clear she doesn't appreciate the attention and Noah, again, jumps in.
Literally. He jumps the guy. The other boy goes down, everyone looks horrified,
Elle runs off and Noah goes after her.
He yells her name multiple times before slamming his fist on the
hood of the car to get her to turn around. He then orders her into the same
car. And...she does.
Am I the only one who sees the problem with this? It would seem
that I am in a minority, at least on tumblr, where all the posts I've found so
far talk about how 'cute' the central romance is. My friend is firmly in this
camp and told me to 'stop poking holes in a cute plot' when I voiced my
concerns. One reviewer on IMDb seems to be on the same page as me, so I'm not
completely alone.
Let me make this abundantly clear: getting into a confined space
with a guy who beats someone up, yells at you, attacks a vehicle and then
orders you to get into that same vehicle with them behind the wheel is a
TERRIBLE idea. Noah is controlling and violent and in a different film he would
likely be a serial killer in the making. Instead, once he gets Elle into the
car he starts spouting romance movie cliches about how he 'just wants to keep
her safe' and 'can't stop thinking about her'. And because the writers clearly
have no concept of how dangerous this all is, they make Elle melt into Noah's
arms. Throwing caution (and her friendship with Lee) to the wind, Elle ends up
staying out all night with Noah and losing her virginity under the Hollywood
sign. For once, the fact that movie characters got that close to the famous
landmark isn't the most unbelievable plot point.
Just because everyone has problems doesn’t mean violence is
ok, Noah!!
The next few scenes are played for laughs as Elle and Noah attempt
to hide their relationship from their family and friends. Though, considering
they hang out and canoodle in highly populated areas I'm not sure how they
manage to keep it a secret for so long. They even go so far as to have sex on a
school desk (bloody hell that's confidence), which leads to yet another deeply
unsettling hilarious scene where Elle realises the classroom has a
security camera and has to get herself sent to the principal's office so that
she can steal the incriminating tape. Ah, such fun.
At one point, Elle muses "If you can't tell your best friend
what you're doing, you probably shouldn't be doing it." Amen sister. Shame
you don't take your own advice.
Elle and Noah's relationship is revealed to Lee when he comes home
and catches the two together. They're not in a compromising position, at least
not in the traditional sense. Elle has slipped, fallen and cut her face, so
Noah is helping to clean the wound.
Lee's first thought upon seeing this? That Noah has roughed her
up.
RED FRICKING FLAG. When your boyfriend's brother, who has lived
with him all his life, immediately believes that your boyfriend has caused you
physical harm, that is a sign that your boyfriend is not safe to be
around!
Lee is shouted down and storms off, Elle mollifies Noah, he asks
her to prom, she melts yet again and Lee returns just in time to see them.
Things escalate as it's revealed Noah has received counselling for his
outbursts, which doesn't seem to have been particularly effective as it isn't
long before he gets angry with Lee and jumps at him. Elle is standing to the
side, crying and screaming for him to stop, but it still takes Noah a moment to
stop holding Lee down.
When he does, Lee tells Elle their friendship is over and storms
off for good, so she breaks things off with Noah who leaves in a strop. Elle
later takes pains to apologise to Lee but he's still hurt and wants nothing to
do with her. Noah, continuing to show that he is not remotely stable, starts
missing school and is apparently in danger of not graduating. No biggie.
All of this leads up to the obligatory prom. Elle and Lee
reconcile shortly before and return to their original plan to go together, with
Lee's girlfriend in tow. The theme is memories, the kissing booth has been
recreated and Noah turns up to publicly declare his love for Elle (because a
private declaration without a room full of your peers watching would be far too
discreet).
Because there are still 15 minutes of film left, Elle rejects Noah
as she doesn't want to continue hurting people she loves with their
relationship (in addition to Lee, Elle's sole surviving parent disapproves).
Noah leaves again, this time 'for good', as he has somehow managed to get into
Harvard and is inexplicably leaving early.
Lee and Elle throw a joint birthday party at his house and
everyone has to wear a costume. The moment this was announced I groaned because
I knew something stupid with masks would have to come up. I've been here
before.
Elle watches Lee with his girlfriend and realises she wants love
too so she tells Lee she needs to tell Noah she feels the same way. Lee tells
her to go for it (what??) and says he'll help her 'find' Noah before running
off in his Batman-style costume. Elle meets Lee in his car, which she is for
some reason driving, and monologues about how she has to find Noah and tell him
how she feels, which is helpful because, while Lee is already aware of all
this, Noah is not and he is revealed to be the passenger in the car having
swapped costumes with Lee. She almost crashes the car, they make out and live
happily ever after.
Well, not really, because the film ends with Elle dropping Noah
off at the airport before leaving on his motorcycle. She rides off thinking
that maybe things really will work out with Noah, or maybe they won't, and
that's ok.
Huh? I mean, I know I don't want this couple to succeed, but
judging by social media there are a lot of people who do, so why would set up
your characters with a big romantic moment and then suggest a breakup mere
minutes later? I just can't with this film.
But back to that 'big romantic gesture'. We are supposed to
believe that Elle tells Lee she loves Noah and Lee immediately runs to Noah
(who is hiding in his dark room like all serial killers moody
teenagers broken love interests), swaps costumes with him and tells
him where to find Elle. Are you really trying to tell me that Lee, who knows
how violent his brother is and took less than a second to jump to a domestic
violence conclusion earlier (before he even knew they were a couple no less!),
would set things up so that Noah and Elle would be trapped together in confined
space and moving at speed? What if she'd changed her mind? Would Noah have
attacked her or caused an accident some other way? Previous scenes would
suggest so. But they're the central couple, so of course that doesn't
happen. And Lee has already shown that he fiercely protects Elle...sometimes.
And nothing truly terrible happens to the main characters, so I guess we're
supposed to see it all as a win.
So what do these two films tell young people, particularly young
women, about relationships?
From the central couple in Chasing Liberty, we learn
that deception is fine if her dad is paying you and sleeping with her when she
doesn't know who you are is fine if you say you're in love. If a guy lies to
you, you can totally be unhappy about it, for a while. But as long as he says
he loves you and has a cute British accent (damn you Matthew Goode!) it is
perfectly reasonable to chase him around the world at the end of the film and
fall into each other's arms.
We also learn that bullying and harassing a woman into falling for
you is totally fine if you’re a peripheral character who hasn't had a shag
in a while, poor baby. And just because she says no doesn't mean in any way
that she actually means no. Ladies, keep your eye out for the next guy who
hassles you on the street. He could be your soulmate!
And The Kissing Booth? Well, from this little gem we
learn that abandoning your drunk friend at a party is A-OK; that going behind
your friend's back and doing something they specifically asked you not to do is
fine if they eventually forgive you, even if it clearly upsets them greatly;
that kissing booths are a completely appropriate way to fundraise for a
secondary school. And most of all, we learnt that it is totally fine for a guy
to be angry, violent and potentially abusive as long as he's tall, attractive,
and speaks in rom-com cliches.
It's worth noting that The Kissing Booth began as
a serial on Wattpad, an online writing community, when the author, Beth
Reekles, was just 15 years old. I haven't read it, so who knows if the less
savoury character traits were included in the original or if they were added
for the film. If it's the former, that worries me even more. If a teenage girl
considers this a wonderful love story then we have a serious problem with the
way relationships are portrayed in popular media.
Congrats everybody. We've clearly achieved so much.
Sunday, May 13, 2018
"Achieve your wildest dreams": Jessica Irwin is using ground-breaking music software that allows people living with high-level physical disability to use only their eyes to make music
This piece is housed on the entertainment website Music Love – a platform for women, by women and about women in music.
Steve
Balbi with Jessica Irwin. Image by Russell Cherry
There is no way you could keep up with everything Jessica
Irwin does; just writing it down could make you weary. An accomplished
musician, author, illustrator, photographer and web designer, she has
established her own business, the appropriately named DARE2BU, specialising in
landscape photography, portraiture, prepress design, website design and website
development.
Irwin's Cerebral Palsy means that the only parts of her body
she has full control over are her eyes and mind but she’s not daunted. By
anything. And now she’s got the technology to make even better use of her
talents and determination.
Dr Jordan Nguyen and his team at Psykinetic, a company aimed
at creating inclusive, futuristic technologies, have developed the
ground-breaking program ATMOSPHERE. Operated entirely through eye movements,
the software allows people with high-level physical disabilities to create
music with eye power.
ATMOSPHERE gave Irwin the chance to accompany the Australian
Piano Quartet at the Sydney Opera House, TEDx Salon and Telstra Vantage 2017.
With the software she can create music in real time, add instruments, play
individual notes, chords and layer tracks to produce complex musical creations.
Now Irwin has collaborated with Steve Balbi to create Winners (Psykinetic Mix),
the first single to be released and recorded with ATMOSPHERE. The track is a
reimagining of Winners, from Balbi's debut solo LP Black Rainbow.
Irwin can now continue to expand her repertoire and pursue
her musical dreams. Far from being held back by her disability, Irwin is
thriving. She spoke to Music Love about her music, her business and how she
manages to do it all.
You’ve just released a fantastic single
with Steve Balbi, Winners (Psykinetic Mix), using the
revolutionary ATMOSPHERE technology. Can you tell us about how the
ATMOSPHERE program works and how you use it?
Psykinetic ATMOSPHERE is eye-controlled music creation
software that allows you to produce and play music in a live setting. The
program works by tracking your eye movements and blinks using an external eye
tracker and a Windows PC or Tablet. On your screen, there is a pie circle that
is divided into twelve segments. Each segment represents an individual note or
a sound sequence that musicians can preload to create their own unique musical
creation. To activate a sound you look at it and blink. So in theory, making an
individual sound isn’t that hard, but to do an entire performance requires an
extremely good memory because you can't look away from the screen whilst
playing with your eyes! Furthermore as I have athatoid cerebral palsy, physically
playing in time takes an extraordinary amount of energy to attempt to control
involuntary muscle spasms whilst keeping count. It is like running a marathon
every time I perform! But that is how it should be…I believe you should give
everything you have when you are on the stage, especially when that is with
Steve Balbi!
What was it like to hear the results
for the first time?
I remember when I first triggered a sound on Psykinetic
ATMOSPHERE, our software engineer Nick Temple, quietly recorded some electric
guitar chords. Nick placed Psykinetic ATMOSPHERE in front of me so I could do
the initial tests. So, I looked at a key and blinked and all of a sudden a
gnarly electric guitar chord shook the table and I thought, “Yep Nick, this is
definitely my type of sound!”
How did you get involved with Steve
Balbi and Psykinetic? What does it mean to you to be involved with such a
ground-breaking first in music production?
I consider myself extraordinarily lucky to have an army of
the greatest mentors behind me. One of these amazing humans is Steve Balbi. I
attended a Led Zeppelin tribute show five years ago where Steve was performing.
Every time he came on stage he had the audience’s sole attention. However, I
could definitely tell there was so much more to him than what I was seeing
during that set. At first I saw this bizarre, energetic rockstar bouncing
around the stage, then as I got to know him more I loved listening to his
stories, admire his honesty, and strive to be such a good human as he is.
Steve and I always entertained the idea that one day I would
join him on stage, however, realistically we both thought that wouldn’t be
physically possible. BUT… Then Dr Jordan Nguyen, Founder and CEO of Psykinetic,
attended a gig and saw first-hand just how strong my desire was to join Steve.
So, Jordan went away and made it his goal to create software that could allow
me to perform with Steve! And he did!!
Psykinetic is a social business that aims to create a more
inclusive society through creating empowering technology. I am really
passionate about my involvement with Psykinetic. Technology truly means freedom
when you have a severe physical disability. I first became involved in
Psykinetic when I received a phone call from Dr Jordan asking me if I would
like to be involved in Psykinetic’s eye controlled music project. As you can
imagine he didn’t even get to finish that sentence before I cut him off with
“YES!” As well as being a musician with Psykinetic, I am also part of the team
as a website developer and photographer.
Psykinetic ATMOSPHERE will unlock so many more hidden
musicians that now have the opportunity to let their inner musician shine! I am
really keen to spread the word about this software because it has the potential
to have a wonderful impact on so many. To give somebody the ability to play
music is something really special! I can’t wait to jam with more eye-controlled
musicians and see what they bring to the table. Music is not just about a cool
groovy beat … when you add a piece of you to that beat suddenly your inner
voice takes the stage. It truly is an awesome moment.
Dr
Jordan Nguyen, Steve Balbi, Jessica Irwin and team. Image Russell Cherry
Why
did you and Steve decide to reimagine Winners, a song from Steve’s
2014 debut solo LP, rather than create a brand new piece?
Both Steve and I have a really strong connection to his
song Winners, so it was only natural that would be our first song.
This song symbolises how sometimes you are forced to fight with everything you
have just to survive, then when you do finally win you are too exhausted to
realise you have done so!!! I have to fight the same fight everyday, to prove
to the public what I am capable of because of my cerebral palsy and it does get
exhausting. However, then I turn around and see Steve with boxing gloves on too
fighting his own completely different fight. That encourages and inspires me to
turn back around and tackle my round #96587 with full force!!!!!!
You accompanied the Australian Piano
Quartet at the Sydney Opera House last year using the ATMOSPHERE program. What
was that performance like and what has changed for you since then?
My first performance with the Australia Piano Quartet at the
Sydney Opera House was back in 2016. Everything was extremely new to me at this
stage, and my introduction to playing music was classical with an instrument
that nobody had witnessed before.
The weeks leading up to that performance I was thinking
“Yep… We are going to make this work… We always do!”. On the day I was sitting
on stage in a nice elegant dress confident that I had given everything I had,
and we received a standing ovation! Then I proceeded to sleep for a week after
that performance!
I feel it has been really valuable to play with both the
Quartet and Steve because in many ways they are polar opposites, so I have been
able to build two completely different skill sets! The Quartet have a very
traditional style that taught me discipline in the classical environment. And
then there’s… Steve!!!! Steve and I are really similar, I don’t even need a
communication device when I am with him – he just knows. Steve is extremely
knowledgeable with the tech side of music production, I love collaborating with
Steve which has given me more of an insight into music production and I have
had a lot of fun embarking on the ProTools journey and creating performances
with him. We did this at the launch of Psykinetic on April 11th, as I started
our set completely with my own composition. Hearing our creations bellow out on
stage has the ability to shake the whole room! And plus I really love my skull
skirt and leather jacket!!!!
In a changing world where music can be created in so many
different ways by people with completely different visions and skillsets, what
does music mean to you?
Music for me is the freedom to let my inner voice escape! As
humans we tend to bottle emotions up, but when you are creating music, whether
it is writing lyrics or laying down a groove, your emotions finally see the
light. Then other people hear your songs and take ownership of the story
because it is their tale as well.
You’ve created your own business,
DARE2BU, which specialises in a variety of visual design platforms from
landscape photography to portraiture and web design. You’re also recognised not
just as a musician but as an illustrator, author, photographer and web
designer. How do you have time to pursue all your passions and is there one you
focus on more heavily?
I don’t sleep… EVER!!!!! I am a really creative person,
music and photography are my passions, while my web development pays the bills.
However, lately the music side of things have really taken over. Two years ago
playing music for me was physically impossible, and today with Psykinetic’s
creation it has become my reality!
Together with Psykinetic and Steve I really would like to
push this as far as we can, showing other people in my situation that it is
definitely possible!
You are going to be inspiring countless
other musicians and performers to pursue their dreams and you’re showing them a
way to do it. Who are some people in music who inspire you?
I have a handful of musicians who really inspire me: David
Bowie, Mi-Sex, Steve Balbi, Pink and Keala Settle!!! Keala Settle’s version of
“THIS IS ME!” is the bomb!!! Keala puts so much raw emotion into that
particular song!!! When I am fighting nerves before a big performance, Keala’s
voice pops into my head “When the sharpest words wanna cut me down, gonna send
a flood , gonna drown ‘em out… I am brave, I am bruised, I’m who i am meant to
be, THIS IS ME!”
What comes next for you?
That is always a really interesting question!!! I would love
to grow my knowledge using ProTools, and collaborate with Steve so much more.
Create our own songs together!!!
I would love to perform with Steve, Keala Settle and David
Duchovny on one stage, that would be really interesting!
In all honestly I just want to set an example for the
younger generation, to keep fighting the good fight and you will be able to
achieve your wildest dreams!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




